Listen

Pause Resume

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s two-day visit to Mumbai last week did more than deliver a diplomatic photo-op — it crystallised a strategic shift. Against the backdrop of the UK-India Free Trade Agreement, the prime minister’s 125-member business delegation sealed a string of commitments that, taken together, are turning India’s Global Capability Centres (GCCs) into Europe’s preferred offshore innovation layer.

According to the UK government’s post-visit statement, the mission secured commitments that translate into roughly 10,600 jobs for Britain and underscored renewed commercial momentum between the two economies.

The headline numbers — and they are headline numbers — tell only part of the story. The broader pivot is in the £3.6 billion worth of pledges from 29 UK firms to expand in India. These are not routine outsourcing deals. Rather, they are targeted investments into engineering, AI, semiconductor design, fintech and R&D hubs inside India, signalling a move from labour arbitrage to capability arbitrage.

According to the UK-India Free Trade Agreement summary, adopted in late July, the deal has already reduced key tariffs and cut red tape, creating a more predictable environment for long-term capital deployment. That legal certainty, combined with competitive talent pools, is luring British companies to anchor higher-value work in Indian GCCs.

Take Graphcore –  according to the company’s announcement, the SoftBank-owned AI chipmaker has committed up to £1 billion to open an AI engineering campus in Bengaluru, aiming to hire some 500 semiconductor specialists over the next decade. That kind of scale — a hardware R&D campus, not just code and QA teams — reframes what a GCC can be.

Similarly, several UK fintechs and digital-only banks announced multi-hundred-million pound commitments aimed squarely at product, payments and crypto engineering within their India hubs. Those investments are less about shaving unit costs and more about securing 24/7 engineering cycles, specialist talent and proximity to fast-moving markets where real-time product testing is possible at scale.

India’s GCC ecosystem is already vast. According to a June 2025 industry report, the country hosts well over 1,700 GCCs employing millions and contributing tens of billions in revenue — numbers that only amplify the commercial logic for inward UK capital.

The appeal for Britain is simple: facing higher wages and a talent squeeze at home, UK multinationals are pragmatically relocating parts of their innovation stack to where skilled engineers, data scientists and domain specialists are abundant. For India, the gain is a different class of opportunity — jobs that propel upskilling, R&D clusters and manufacturing linkages that go beyond call-centre economics.

State policies are helping. Several Indian states have freshly calibrated incentives for GCC growth: from capital subsidies and operating support to targeted skilling tie-ups with universities. That patchwork of incentives is converting regional competition into a national advantage, pulling investment away from metropolitan congestion and toward a more distributed innovation map.

Yet risks remain. Talent retention and quality control are recurring concerns, as are data governance and IP protections when sensitive R&D is moved offshore. Both governments and companies are scrambling to address these frictions — through visa facilitation, data-flow clauses in the FTA and local upskilling programs — but the devil is in the execution.

For businesses watching closely, the current wave looks different from past offshoring cycles. This time, the transfers are strategic: chip design floors, AI labs, fintech core-banking teams and healthcare supply-chain engineering. They represent a deliberate rearrangement of where value is created and who owns the intellectual heavy lifting.

If the recent commitments hold, the UK-India axis will do more than deepen bilateral trade: it will redraw parts of Europe’s innovation geography. Britain’s gamble is to plug into India’s engineering surge; India’s gain is a steadier diet of high-value projects and institutional partnerships.

According to market analysts tracking GCC evolution, this is the moment when captive centres stop being peripheral cost centres and start looking like integral parts of global R&D roadmaps.

Starmer’s Mumbai mission may be measured in jobs and pounds, but its longer influence will be judged by whether these centres become generators of original product and intellectual property — and whether the legal and skills ecosystems mature fast enough to keep them there. The early signs point to a co-authored future: Indian engineers building Britain’s next-generation products, and British capital seeding India’s rise as Europe’s offshore innovation powerhouse.